> I suggest that, once you have put your clips (video, audio, etc.) and > place (that is, zooming-in far beyond/below the current 1s limit). > lack of precision, unless an gigantic magnifying glass were put into Even if this bug were fixed, there would still be some HOWEVER, you are then limited by the pixel-to-time-frame > "by hand" (click& hold-slide- drop) the videos and audios on the time. > I understand that it is more intuitive and agreeable to work by moving Than 5 minutes, but yes, it would loose the intuitive way from drag andĮl mié, 21-03-2012 a las 14:42 +0000, madpentiste escribió: Your proposal should fix the precision problem working with clips longer Even if this bug were fixed, there would still be some lack of precision, unless an gigantic magnifying glass were put into place (that is, zooming-in far beyond/below the current 1s limit). HOWEVER, you are then limited by the pixel-to-time-frame relationship. I understand that it is more intuitive and agreeable to work by moving "by hand" (click&hold-slide-drop) the videos and audios on the time-line. This position is modifiable, which allows you to fine-tune where you want each of your objects (videos, audios, transitions) to be placed on the time-line (and many more fine-tuning possibilities). When you right-click on a clip or a transition and select "properties", you have access to its position on the time-line with a 1/100s precision. I suggest that, once you have put your clips (video, audio, etc.) and transitions on the time-line ROUGHLY were you want them to be, you use the tools provided by the "properties" menus, as follows. I understand that it is more intuitive and agreeable to work by moving "by hand" (click& hold-slide- drop) the videos and audios on the time-line.
0 kommentar(er)
